October 08, 2017

TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – SAMUEL BECKETT : WAITING FOR GODOT


TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – SAMUEL BECKETT : WAITING FOR GODOT TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – SAMUEL BECKETT : WAITING FOR GODOT


Samuel Beckett: *Waiting for Godot* (1953)

*Waiting for Godot* is a play by Samuel Beckett, first performed in 1953 in Paris. It is arguably the most famous and influential work of the **Theatre of the Absurd**—a dramatic movement that rejects logical structure, realistic characterization, and meaningful action to express the philosophical belief that human existence is purposeless and incomprehensible.

**Plot Summary**

The plot is deliberately minimal. Two tramps, Vladimir (Didi) and Estragon (Gogo), wait beside a barren tree for the arrival of a mysterious figure named Godot, who never comes. To pass the time, they talk, argue, contemplate hanging themselves, eat carrots, and trade hats. They are interrupted by the arrival of Pozzo, a domineering master, and his slave, Lucky, whom Pozzo drives with a rope. Pozzo delivers a histrionic speech; Lucky performs a frantic, nonsensical "dance" and a long, fragmented monologue. After they depart, a boy arrives to announce that Godot will not come today but will surely come tomorrow. Act II repeats the first act with minor variations: the tree has sprouted a few leaves, Pozzo has gone blind, Lucky is mute, and the boy again delivers the same message. The play famously ends with Vladimir and Estragon resolving to leave—but neither moves.

**Major Themes**

- **Waiting and Meaninglessness:** The central action is waiting for someone who never arrives. This becomes a metaphor for the human condition: we fill time with trivial activities, hoping for a purpose or salvation that never materializes.

- **Repetition and Stasis:** Act II mirrors Act I, suggesting that nothing changes, no progress occurs. Beckett captures the tedium and circularity of existence.

- **Language as Failed Communication:** The characters talk incessantly but rarely communicate. Pozzo's speeches are empty rhetoric; Lucky's monologue is a torrent of broken academic fragments. Language does not clarify—it obscures.

- **Ambiguity of Godot:** Who or what is Godot? God? Death? Meaning? Beckett famously said, "If I knew, I would have said so in the play." The ambiguity is the point.

**Legacy**

*Waiting for Godot* revolutionized modern drama. Its stripped-down set, circular structure, and refusal to offer resolution or catharsis challenged every convention of Western theatre. The play remains a powerful, bleak, and strangely comic meditation on hope, habit, and the human need to keep waiting—even for nothing.

TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – T.S.ELIOT : MURDER IN THE CATHEDRAL


TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – T.S.ELIOT : MURDER IN THE CATHEDRAL TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – T.S.ELIOT : MURDER IN THE CATHEDRAL

T.S. Eliot: *Murder in the Cathedral* (1935)

*Murder in the Cathedral* is a verse drama by T.S. Eliot, written for the Canterbury Festival in 1935. It dramatizes the historical assassination of Archbishop Thomas Becket in Canterbury Cathedral in 1170, transforming a political killing into a profound meditation on martyrdom, temptation, spiritual pride, and the conflict between Church and State.

**Plot Summary**

The play opens with a Chorus of the Women of Canterbury, expressing fear and foreboding. Thomas Becket returns after seven years of exile in France, following his bitter conflict with King Henry II. He is visited by four Tempters:

1. **First Tempter:** Offers sensual pleasure and careless ease.

2. **Second Tempter:** Offers power, wealth, and the office of Chancellor.

3. **Third Tempter:** Suggests an alliance with the barons against the King—political resistance.

4. **Fourth Tempter (the most subtle):** Urges Becket to seek martyrdom for earthly glory and posthumous fame—to do the right deed for the wrong reason.

Becket rejects all temptations, resolving to accept martyrdom not because he desires it but because he will not betray his conscience. On Christmas morning, he preaches a sermon on the true meaning of martyrdom. Four knights arrive from the King and, after a heated debate, murder Becket at the altar. The knights then address the audience directly, offering rational, legalistic justifications for their act. The Chorus laments and finally accepts the paradox: the blood of the saints fertilizes the Church.

**Major Themes**

- **Temptation and the Will:** The most dangerous temptation is spiritual pride—seeking martyrdom for self-glorification. Becket's famous line: "The last temptation is the greatest treason: / To do the right deed for the wrong reason."

- **The Chorus:** Eliot's Chorus represents ordinary human fear and suffering, unable to comprehend but finally witnessing transcendence.

- **Church vs. State:** The play explores the limits of political power. Becket insists: "The King is not the Church."

**Style and Legacy** Eliot uses varied verse forms—lyrical choruses, conversational blank verse, homiletic prose for Becket's sermon, and parodic rhymed couplets for the knights. The play is ritualistic and anti-naturalistic. *Murder in the Cathedral* remains a modern masterpiece of religious drama, admired for its poetic power, psychological depth, and unsentimental exploration of authentic faith and the cost of witness.

TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – J.M.SYNGE : PLAYBOY OF THE WESTERN WORLD


TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – J.M.SYNGE : PLAYBOY OF THE WESTERN WORLD TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – J.M.SYNGE : PLAYBOY OF THE WESTERN WORLD

J.M. Synge: *The Playboy of the Western World* (1907)

*The Playboy of the Western World* is the most famous and controversial play by Irish dramatist John Millington Synge (1871–1909). A cornerstone of the Irish Literary Revival, this tragicomedy is set in a rural pub in County Mayo on Ireland's west coast. It blends devastating satire, poetic language, and violent farce to critique Irish rural life, the cult of violence, and the very nature of heroism.

**Plot Summary**

Christy Mahon, a timid, battered young man, stumbles into a remote pub claiming he has just killed his tyrannical father by splitting his head with a loy (a spade). Far from being horrified, the pub's patronsespecially the women are electrified. Pegeen Mike, the publican's sharp-tongued daughter, falls in love with him. The community transforms Christy into a "playboy" (hero): they praise his deed, toast his courage, and compete for his attention. Christy blossoms under their admiration, becoming bold and eloquent. Then his father, very much alive, staggers into the pub with a bandaged head. Christy, horrified that his heroic status will collapse, attacks his father again this time in full view of the villagers. Suddenly, they condemn him as a parricide and a brute. Christy finally asserts genuine independence, bidding farewell to Pegeen and walking off with his father in tow.

**Major Themes**

- **The Construction of Heroism:** Synge brilliantly shows how a community creates a hero out of a lie. The same act that was praised as brave becomes monstrous when witnessed directly. Heroism, the play suggests, depends on distance and myth.

- **Violence and Irish Identity:** Synge satirizes the Irish romanticization of violence and the "barbarous" west. The villagers cheer patricide until it appears real.

- **Language:** The play is famous for its Hiberno-English dialect—lyrical, rhythmic, and richly metaphorical ("I've heard tell that the English are always laughing at us, but I'd rather be a fool in the west of Ireland than a king in the east").

**Controversy and Legacy**

The play sparked the **Playboy Riots** at Dublin's Abbey Theatre in 1907, with nationalists outraged by its perceived slur on Irish womanhood (the women lust after a "murderer") and its mocking of Catholic piety. Today, it is recognized as a masterpiece of 20th-century drama—a dark, hilarious, and unsettling exploration of myth-making, identity, and the gap between reality and story.

TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – GEORGE BERNARD SHAW : PYGMALION


TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – GEORGE BERNARD SHAW : PYGMALION


George Bernard Shaw: *Pygmalion* (1913)

*Pygmalion* is George Bernard Shaw's most famous and enduring play—a witty, sharp-edged comedy that critiques social class, language, gender, and the illusion of inherent gentility. Premiered in Vienna in 1913 and in London in 1914, the play subverts the ancient Greek myth of Pygmalion, a sculptor who falls in love with his own carved statue (Galatea). Shaw replaces marble with a Cockney flower girl, and divine intervention with the brutal science of phonetics.

**Plot Summary**

Professor Henry Higgins, an arrogant and brilliant phonetician, boasts that he can transform Eliza Doolittle, a poor flower girl with vulgar speech, into a duchess in six months simply by teaching her to speak "proper" English. He makes a bet with Colonel Pickering, a fellow linguist. Higgins subjects Eliza to relentless drills, treating her as an experiment rather than a human being. She undergoes a painful but successful transformation. At an embassy ball, she passes as royalty. However, the victory is hollow: Eliza, now articulate and elegant, has no place in the world. She cannot return to her old life (she no longer fits), but neither can she join the upper class—her speech is perfect, yet her social origins would still exclude her. In Shaw's original ending (often ignored by sentimental productions), Eliza defiantly leaves Higgins, walking away to marry Freddy Eynsford-Hill (a kind but useless young man) and open a flower shop—rejecting Higgins's offer to live with him as an intellectual curiosity.

**Major Themes**

- **Language as Class Barrier:** Shaw famously argued that the English class system is perpetuated by pronunciation. Eliza's transformation is not about inner worth but about accent.

- **The Problem of Independence:** Unlike the myth, Shaw's "Galatea" refuses to be owned. Eliza demands respect and self-determination: "I sold flowers. I didn't sell myself. Now you've made a lady of me, I'm not fit to sell anything else."

- **Anti-Romanticism:** Shaw viciously parodies romantic love. Higgins is a bullying, self-centered misogynist; their relationship is not love but master-pupil combat.

**Legacy**

*Pygmalion* remains a cornerstone of modern drama. Its most famous adaptation is the musical *My Fair Lady* (1956, film 1964), which softened Shaw's ending into a romantic reunion—a change Shaw vehemently opposed. The play continues to be performed for its brilliant dialogue, social critique, and the unforgettable character of Eliza Doolittle, who refuses to be a statue.

TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – SEAMUS HEANEY


TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – SEAMUS HEANEY TWENTIETH CENTURY ENGLISH LITERATURE – SEAMUS HEANEY

Seamus Heaney (1939–2013)

Seamus Justin Heaney was an Irish poet, playwright, translator, and educator. He received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1995 "for works of lyrical beauty and ethical depth, which exalt everyday miracles and the living past." Born into a farming family in County Derry, Northern Ireland, Heaney's poetry is deeply rooted in the landscape, language, and tensions of his homeland.

**Life and Career**

Heaney studied English at Queen's University Belfast and later taught at Harvard and Oxford (where he served as Professor of Poetry, 1989–1994). His first collection, *Death of a Naturalist* (1966), announced a major new voice—luminous, tactile, and grounded in rural memory. Over five decades, he published a dozen major poetry collections, several volumes of criticism, and acclaimed translations, including *Beowulf* (1999), which became a bestseller.

**Major Themes and Style**

Heaney's work moves through several overlapping phases:

- **Rural and Domestic Life:** Early poems ("Digging," "Blackberry-Picking," "The Forge") celebrate manual labor, family, and the sensory richness of the farm—but without sentimentality.

- **The Troubles:** As sectarian violence erupted in Northern Ireland, Heaney's poetry engaged with political conflict indirectly, through myth, archaeology, and historical analogy. *North* (1975) uses Viking and bog-body imagery to explore violence and identity.

- **Personal and Elegiac:** Later collections (*The Haw Lantern*, *Seeing Things*, *The Spirit Level*) turn toward elegy, fatherhood, mortality, and wonder. "The Harvest Bow," "Mid-Term Break" (a devastating poem about his brother's death), and "Clearances" (for his mother) are among his most moving works.

- **Translation and Classics:** His *Beowulf* reinvigorated the Old English epic with Hiberno-English diction. He also translated Virgil, Sophocles, and Dante.

**Style and Technique**

Heaney is celebrated for his **exact physical imagery, musicality, and moral seriousness**. He blends Anglo-Saxon alliterative verse with Irish speech rhythms. His language is simultaneously plain and richly textured—capable of domestic intimacy and mythic resonance.

**Legacy**

Heaney is often called "the greatest Irish poet since Yeats." He bridged the nationalist and unionist divide in Northern Ireland without claiming to represent either side. His death in 2013 prompted international mourning. His poetry continues to be read for its ethical warmth, technical mastery, and profound connection to place—"the music of what happens."