October 10, 2017

AMERICAN LITERATURE - HARPER LEE: TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD


AMERICAN LITERATURE - HARPER LEE: TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD AMERICAN LITERATURE - HARPER LEE: TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD

AMERICAN LITERATURE - ARTHUR MILLER: THE DEATH OF A SALESMAN


AMERICAN LITERATURE - ARTHUR MILLER: THE DEATH OF A SALESMAN AMERICAN LITERATURE - ARTHUR MILLER: THE DEATH OF A SALESMAN

AMERICAN LITERATURE - WALLACE STEVENS : POETRY OF WALLACE STEVENS


AMERICAN LITERATURE - WALLACE STEVENS : POETRY OF WALLACE STEVENS AMERICAN LITERATURE - WALLACE STEVENS : POETRY OF WALLACE STEVENS


Wallace Stevens’s poetry is the art of ultimate delight: a lifelong meditation on the relationship between imagination and reality. An insurance executive who wrote in near-total obscurity, Stevens produced a body of work that is at once sensuously luxurious and philosophically rigorous—each poem an attempt to create “fictive things” that make the world habitable.

His central concern is the human need for order in a universe stripped of traditional faith. In “The Idea of Order at Key West,” the singer’s art does not imitate the sea’s chaos but imposes a human shape upon it: “It was she who created the world we see.” Stevens rejects both religious consolation and scientific positivism; meaning, he insists, is made, not found. The famous jar in “Anecdote of the Jar” takes “dominion everywhere” not because it is special, but because human attention makes it so.

Stevens’s style matches his philosophy. His diction mingles exotic Latinate words (“vermilion,” “palmirean”) with plain American speech. His syntax coils and clarifies, inviting multiple readings. “Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird” offers fragmented perspectives that never resolve into a single truth—truth is the sum of perspectives. “The Emperor of Ice-Cream” commands “Let be be finale of seem,” reminding us that death is real, but so is the pleasure of the moment: the “wenches dawdling in their customary veils.”

His late masterpieces, like “Notes Toward a Supreme Fiction” and “The Auroras of Autumn,” address mortality directly. The supreme fiction is not a god but a way of seeing—a willingness to say “It must be abstract” and “It must change” and “It must give pleasure.” As he writes in “The Snow Man,” to see the world without human projection is to behold “nothing that is not there and the nothing that is.”

Stevens died in 1955, leaving a legacy of poems that celebrate the mind’s power to transform reality through acts of imaginative perception. “After the final no,” he wrote, “there comes a yes / And on that yes the future world depends.”

AMERICAN LITERATURE - EUGENE O’NEILL: THIRST


AMERICAN LITERATURE - EUGENE O’NEILL: THIRST AMERICAN LITERATURE - EUGENE O’NEILL: THIRST

Eugene O’Neill’s *Thirst* (1913) is a stark, muscular one-act play that anticipates the existential despair and theatrical ambition of his later masterpieces. Written during his early twenties while recovering from tuberculosis in New London, Connecticut, the play bears the influence of O’Neill’s own sea-roving years and the cultural trauma of the 1912 *Titanic* disaster . Though a young writer’s work, *Thirst* reveals the raw elements—nature’s indifference, class conflict, and the thin veneer of civilization—that would define modern American drama.

The play’s premise is brutally simple. Three survivors of a shipwreck—a Gentleman, a Dancer, and a West Indian Mulatto Sailor—drift on a tiny raft in a "glassy" sea beneath a pitiless sun. Surrounding them, sharks circle endlessly . O’Neill’s stage directions are unusually specific, creating an atmosphere of oppressive stasis; the sun glares “like a great angry eye of God,” and the only sounds are the Dancer’s sobs and the Sailor’s monotonous “charm” song meant to ward off the sharks . This meticulous direction, which O’Neill insisted upon against the wishes of early collaborators, led his plays to be described as "director proof" and "actor proof" .

As thirst and madness set in, the social distinctions between the characters collapse. The Gentleman and Dancer, representing the "civilized" world, accuse the Sailor of hiding water . In her delirium, the Dancer offers him her diamond necklace, then her body—both of which he refuses with grim practicality . When she finally dances herself to death under the hallucination of performing on stage, the Sailor sharpens his knife, singing a "happy negro melody" and declaring, "We shall eat. We shall drink" . The Gentleman, horrified, pushes the body into the sea; the Sailor stabs him, and both tumble overboard to the sharks. The play ends in vast silence, with only the Dancer’s glittering necklace left on the empty raft .

Critics have identified *Thirst* as O’Neill’s "first flirtation with expressionism" . The characters are not individuals but archetypes—the Gentleman as failed reason, the Dancer as vanquished beauty, the Sailor as primal instinct . The play’s true subject is the silence of nature, which O’Neill presents as an implacable, almost malevolent force against which human struggle is futile . Though melodramatic, *Thirst* showcases O’Neill’s emerging tragic vision: the irony that civilization’s achievements—a first vacation, a triumphant return home—mean nothing to an indifferent universe. The Gentleman’s menu card and the Dancer’s dreams of fame become grotesque souvenirs of a world already lost . In its raw, unsparing form, *Thirst* is the laboratory for the great O’Neill tragedies to come.

October 09, 2017

AMERICAN LITERATURE - SAUL BELLOW: HERZOG


AMERICAN LITERATURE - SAUL BELLOW: HERZOG AMERICAN LITERATURE - SAUL BELLOW: HERZOG

Saul Bellow’s *Herzog* (1964) is a landmark of twentieth-century fiction—a sprawling, intellectually charged novel that captures the fragmented consciousness of its protagonist, Moses E. Herzog, a middle-aged academic unraveling in the wake of personal betrayals. Written in the wake of Bellow’s own tumultuous life, the novel won the National Book Award and cemented his reputation as a master of voice and interiority.

The plot is deceptively simple: Herzog has been abandoned by his second wife, Madeleine, for his best friend, Valentine Gersbach. Reeling, he retreats to his dilapidated house in the Berkshires, unable to work, haunted by memories. Yet the novel’s engine is not action but letters—unsent letters Herzog composes in his mind to everyone from Nietzsche and Heidegger to his dead mother, his ex-wife, and the president. These missives are his attempt to wrestle with modernity’s spiritual emptiness, the failures of marriage, and the meaning of suffering.

Herzog is a classic Bellow protagonist: hyper-educated, prone to intellectual grandiosity, yet deeply vulnerable. He sees himself as a failed man, yet his relentless letter-writing becomes a form of survival. The novel oscillates between farce and tragedy—Herzog’s comic misadventures include accidentally stealing a child’s toy bird and nearly shooting Gersbach—before arriving at a quiet epiphany. In the final pages, lying on a sofa in his abandoned house, he writes simply: “But I’ve been a foolish, docile Herzog. Not a bad man. Not a cruel man. I’ve disappointed and I’ve been disappointed.”

Bellow’s prose is electric, blending high philosophy with streetwise slang, lyricism with brutal comedy. *Herzog* rejects the nihilism of post-war literature, affirming instead the messiness of ordinary consciousness as the only authentic ground for hope. As Herzog concludes: “At this time, he had no messages for anyone. Nothing. Not a single word.” That silence—after so much noise—is not defeat but liberation. Bellow’s genius lies in making thought itself a heroic, absurd, and deeply human act.