August 23, 2022

41.THE BYZANTINE AND SASSANID EMPIRES | A SHORT HISTORY OF THE WORLD | H. G. WELLS

A SHORT HISTORY OF THE WORLD
BY
H. G. WELLS

41.THE BYZANTINE AND SASSANID EMPIRES

The Greek-speaking eastern half of the Roman Empire showed much more political tenacity than the western half. It weathered the disasters of the fifth century A.D., which saw a complete and final breaking up of the original Latin Roman power. Attila bullied the Emperor Theodosius II and sacked and raided almost to the walls of Constantinople, but that city remained intact. The Nubians came down the Nile and looted Upper Egypt, but Lower Egypt and Alexandria were left still fairly prosperous. Most of Asia Minor was held against the Sassanid Persians.

The sixth century, which was an age of complete darkness for the West,

saw indeed a considerable revival of the Greek power. Justinian I

(527-565) was a ruler of very great ambition and energy, and he was

married to the Empress Theodora, a woman of quite equal capacity who

had begun life as an actress. Justinian reconquered North Africa from

the Vandals and most of Italy from the Goths. He even regained the

south of Spain. He did not limit his energies to naval and military

enterprises. He founded a university, built the great church of Sta.

Sophia in Constantinople and codified the Roman law. But in order to

destroy a rival to his university foundation he closed the schools of

philosophy in Athens, which had been going on in unbroken continuity

from the days of Plato, that is to say for nearly a thousand years.

From the third century onwards the Persian Empire had been the

steadfast rival of the Byzantine. The two empires kept Asia Minor,

Syria and Egypt in a state of perpetual unrest and waste. In the first

century A.D., these lands were still at a high level of civilization,

wealthy and with an abundant population, but the continual coming and

going of armies, massacres, looting and war taxation wore them down

steadily until only shattered and ruinous cities remained upon a

countryside of scattered peasants. In this melancholy process of

impoverishment and disorder lower Egypt fared perhaps less badly than

the rest of the world. Alexandria, like Constantinople, continued a

dwindling trade between the east and the west.

THE CHURCH (NOW A MOSQUE) OF S. SOPHIA, CONSTANTINOPLE

THE CHURCH (NOW A MOSQUE) OF S. SOPHIA, CONSTANTINOPLE

The obelisk of Theodosius in in the foreground statue on left

_Photo: Sebah & Foaillier_

Science and political philosophy seemed dead now in both these warring

and decaying empires. The last philosophers of Athens, until their

suppression, preserved the texts of the great literature of the past

with an infinite reverence and want of understanding. But there

remained no class of men in the world, no free gentlemen with bold and

independent habits of thought, to carry on the tradition of frank

statement and enquiry embodied in these writings. The social and

political chaos accounts largely for the disappearance of this class,

but there was also another reason why the human intelligence was

sterile and feverish during this age. In both Persia and Byzantium it

was all age of intolerance. Both empires were religious empires in a

new way, in a way that greatly hampered the free activities of the

human mind.

THE MAGNIFICENT ROOF-WORK IN S. SOPHIA

THE MAGNIFICENT ROOF-WORK IN S. SOPHIA

_Photo: Sebah & Foaillier_

Of course the oldest empires in the world were religious empires,

centring upon the worship of a god or of a god-king. Alexander was

treated as a divinity and the Cæsars were gods in so much as they had

altars and temples devoted to them and the offering of incense was made

a test of loyalty to the Roman state. But these older religions were

essentially religions of act and fact. They did not invade the mind.

If a man offered his sacrifice and bowed to the god, he was left not

only to think but to say practically whatever he liked about the

affair. But the new sort of religions that had come into the world,

and particularly Christianity, turned inward. These new faiths

demanded not simply conformity but understanding belief. Naturally

fierce controversy ensued upon the exact meaning of the things

believed. These new religions were creed religions. The world was

confronted with a new word, Orthodoxy, and with a stern resolve to keep

not only acts but speech and private thought within the limits of a set

teaching. For to hold a wrong opinion, much more to convey it to other

people, was no longer regarded as an intellectual defect but a moral

fault that might condemn a soul to everlasting destruction.

THE RAVENNA PANEL, DEPICTING JUSTINIAN AND HIS COURT

THE RAVENNA PANEL, DEPICTING JUSTINIAN AND HIS COURT

_Photo: Alinari_

THE ROCK HEWN TEMPLE AT PETRA

THE ROCK HEWN TEMPLE AT PETRA

_Photo: Underwood & Underwood_

Both Ardashir I who founded the Sassanid dynasty in the third century

A.D., and Constantine the Great who reconstructed the Roman Empire in

the fourth, turned to religious organizations for help, because in

these organizations they saw a new means of using and controlling the

wills of men. And already before the end of the fourth century both

empires were persecuting free talk and religious innovation. In Persia

Ardashir found the ancient Persian religion of Zoroaster (or

Zarathushtra) with its priests and temples and a sacred fire that burnt

upon its altars, ready for his purpose as a state religion. Before the

end of the third century Zoroastrianism was persecuting Christianity,

and in 277 A.D. Mani, the founder of a new faith, the Manichæans, was

crucified and his body flayed. Constantinople, on its side, was busy

hunting out Christian heresies. Manichæan ideas infected Christianity

and had to be fought with the fiercest methods; in return ideas from

Christianity affected the purity of the Zoroastrian doctrine. All ideas

became suspect. Science, which demands before all things the free

action of an untroubled mind, suffered a complete eclipse throughout

this phase of intolerance.

War, the bitterest theology, and the usual vices of mankind constituted

Byzantine life of those days. It was picturesque, it was romantic; it

had little sweetness or light. When Byzantium and Persia were not

fighting the barbarians from the north, they wasted Asia Minor and

Syria in dreary and destructive hostilities. Even in close alliance

these two empires would have found it a hard task to turn back the

barbarians and recover their prosperity. The Turks or Tartars first

come into history as the allies first of one power and then of another.

In the sixth century the two chief antagonists were Justinian and

Chosroes I; in the opening of the seventh the Emperor Heraclius was

pitted against Chosroes II (580).

At first and until after Heraclius had become Emperor (610) Chosroes II

carried all before him. He took Antioch, Damascus and Jerusalem and

his armies reached Chalcedon, which is in Asia Minor over against

Constantinople. In 619 he conquered Egypt. Then Heraclius pressed a

counter attack home and routed a Persian army at Nineveh (627),

although at that time there were still Persian troops at Chalcedon. In

628 Chosroes II was deposed and murdered by his son, Kavadh, and an

inconclusive peace was made between the two exhausted empires.

Byzantium and Persia had fought their last war. But few people as yet

dreamt of the storm that was even then gathering in the deserts to put

an end for ever to this aimless, chronic struggle.

While Heraclius was restoring order in Syria a message reached him. It

had been brought in to the imperial outpost at Bostra south of

Damascus; it was in Arabic, an obscure Semitic desert language, and it

was read to the Emperor, if it reached him at all, by an interpreter.

It was from someone who called himself “Muhammad the Prophet of God.”

It called upon the Emperor to acknowledge the One True God and to serve

him. What the Emperor said is not recorded.

A similar message came to Kavadh at Ctesiphon. He was annoyed, tore up

the letter, and bade the messenger begone.

This Muhammad, it appeared, was a Bedouin leader whose headquarters

were in the mean little desert town of Medina. He was preaching a new

religion of faith in the One True God.

“Even so, O Lord!” he said; “rend thou his Kingdom from Kavadh.”