A SHORT HISTORY OF THE WORLD BY H. G. WELLS
40.THE HUNS AND THE END OF THE WESTERN EMPIRE
This appearance of a conquering Mongolian people in Europe may be taken to mark a new stage in human history. Until the last century or so before the Christian era, the Mongol and the Nordic peoples had not been in close touch. Far away in the frozen lands beyond the northern forests the Lapps, a Mongolian people, had drifted westward as far as Lapland, but they played no part in the main current of history. For thousands of years the western world carried on the dramatic interplay of the Aryan, Semitic and fundamental brunette peoples with very little interference (except for an Ethiopian invasion of Egypt or so) either from the black peoples to the south or from the Mongolian world in the far East.
It is probable that there were two chief causes for the new westward
drift of the nomadic Mongolians. One was the consolidation of the
great empire of China, its extension northward and the increase of its
population during the prosperous period of the Han dynasty. The other
was some process of climatic change; a lesser rainfall that abolished
swamps and forests perhaps, or a greater rainfall that extended grazing
over desert steppes, or even perhaps both these processes going on in
different regions but which anyhow facilitated a westward migration. A
third contributary cause was the economic wretchedness, internal decay
and falling population of the Roman Empire. The rich men of the later
Roman Republic, and then the tax-gatherers of the military emperors had
utterly consumed its vitality. So we have the factors of thrust, means
and opportunity. There was pressure from the east, rot in the west and
an open road.
The Hun had reached the eastern boundaries of European Russia by the
first century A.D., but it was not until the fourth and fifth centuries
A.D. that these horsemen rose to predominance upon the steppes. The
fifth century was the Hun’s century. The first Huns to come into Italy
were mercenary bands in the pay of Stilicho the Vandal, the master of
Honorius. Presently they were in possession of Pannonia, the empty nest
of the Vandals.
By the second quarter of the fifth century a great war chief had arisen
among the Huns, Attila. We have only vague and tantalizing glimpses of
his power. He ruled not only over the Huns but over a conglomerate of
tributary Germanic tribes; his empire extended from the Rhine cross the
plains into Central Asia. He exchanged ambassadors with China. His
head camp was in the plain of Hungary east of the Danube. There he was
visited by an envoy from Constantinople, Priscus, who has left us an
account of his state. The way of living of these Mongols was very like
the way of living of the primitive Aryans they had replaced. The
common folk were in huts and tents; the chiefs lived in great stockaded
timber halls. There were feasts and drinking and singing by the bards.
The Homeric heroes and even the Macedonian companions of Alexander
would probably have felt more at home in the camp-capital of Attila
than they would have done in the cultivated and decadent court of
Theodosius II, the son of Arcadius, who was then reigning in
Constantinople.
For a time it seemed as though the nomads under the leadership of the
Huns and Attila would play the same part towards the Græco-Roman
civilization of the Mediterranean countries that the barbaric Greeks
had played long ago to the Ægean civilization. It looked like history
repeating itself upon a larger stage. But the Huns were much more
wedded to the nomadic life than the early Greeks, who were rather
migratory cattle farmers than true nomads. The Huns raided and
plundered but did not settle.
For some years Attila bullied Theodosius as he chose. His armies
devastated and looted right down to the walls of Constantinople, Gibbon
says that he totally destroyed no less than seventy cities in the
Balkan peninsula, and Theodosius bought him off by payments of tribute
and tried to get rid of him for good by sending secret agents to
assassinate him. In 451 Attila turned his attention to the remains of
the Latin- speaking half of the empire and invaded Gaul. Nearly every
town in northern Gaul was sacked. Franks, Visigoths and the imperial
forces united against him and he was defeated at Troyes in a vast
dispersed battle in which a multitude of men, variously estimated as
between 150,000 and 300,000, were killed. This checked him in Gaul, but
it did not exhaust his enormous military resources. Next year he came
into Italy by way of Venetia, burnt Aquileia and Padua and looted
Milan.
HEAD OF BARBARIAN CHIEF
HEAD OF BARBARIAN CHIEF
_(In the British Museum)_
Numbers of fugitives from these north Italian towns and particularly
from Padua fled to islands in the lagoons at the head of the Adriatic
and laid there the foundations of the city state of Venice, which was
to become one of the greatest or the trading centres in the middle
ages.
In 453 Attila died suddenly after a great feast to celebrate his
marriage to a young woman, and at his death this plunder confederation
of his fell to pieces. The actual Huns disappear from history, mixed
into the surrounding more numerous Aryan-speaking populations. But
these great Hun raids practically consummated the end of the Latin
Roman Empire. After his death ten different emperors ruled in Rome in
twenty years, set up by Vandal and other mercenary troops. The Vandals
from Carthage took and sacked Rome in 455. Finally in 476 Odoacer, the
chief of the barbarian troops, suppressed a Pannonian who was figuring
as emperor under the impressive name of Romulus Augustulus, and
informed the Court of Constantinople that there was no longer an
emperor in the west. So ingloriously the Latin Roman Empire came to an
end. In 493 Theodoric the Goth became King of Rome.
All over western and central Europe now barbarian chiefs were reigning
as kings, dukes and the like, practically independent but for the most
part professing some sort of shadowy allegiance to the emperor. There
were hundreds and perhaps thousands of such practically independent
brigand rulers. In Gaul, Spain and Italy and in Dacia the Latin speech
still prevailed in locally distorted forms, but in Britain and east of
the Rhine languages of the German group (or in Bohemia a Slavonic
language, Czech) were the common speech. The superior clergy and a
small remnant of other educated men read and wrote Latin. Everywhere
life was insecure and property was held by the strong arm. Castles
multiplied and roads fell into decay. The dawn of the sixth century
was an age of division and of intellectual darkness throughout the
western world. Had it not been for the monks and Christian
missionaries Latin learning might have perished altogether.
Why had the Roman Empire grown and why had it so completely decayed?
It grew because at first the idea of citizenship held it together.
Throughout the days of the expanding republic, and even into the days
of the early empire there remained a great number of men conscious of
Roman citizenship, feeling it a privilege and an obligation to be a
Roman citizen, confident of their rights under the Roman law and
willing to make sacrifices in the name of Rome. The prestige of Rome
as of something just and great and law- upholding spread far beyond the
Roman boundaries. But even as early as the Punic wars the sense of
citizenship was being undermined by the growth of wealth and slavery.
Citizenship spread indeed but not the idea of citizenship.
The Roman Empire was after all a very primitive organization; it did
not educate, did not explain itself to its increasing multitudes of
citizens, did not invite their co-operation in its decisions. There
was no network of schools to ensure a common understanding, no
distribution of news to sustain collective activity. The adventurers
who struggled for power from the days of Marius and Sulla onward had no
idea of creating and calling in public opinion upon the imperial
affairs. The spirit of citizenship died of starvation and no one
observed it die. All empires, all states, all organizations of human
society are, in the ultimate, things of understanding and will. There
remained no will for the Roman Empire in the World and so it came to an
end.
But though the Latin-speaking Roman Empire died in the fifth century,
something else had been born within it that was to avail itself
enormously of its prestige and tradition, and that was the
Latin-speaking half of the Catholic Church. This lived while the empire
died because it appealed to the minds and wills of men, because it had
books and a great system of teachers and missionaries to hold it
together, things stronger than any law or legions. Throughout the
fourth and fifth centuries A.D. while the empire was decaying,
Christianity was spreading to a universal dominion in Europe. It
conquered its conquerors, the barbarians. When Attila seemed disposed
to march on Rome, the patriarch of Rome intercepted him and did what no
armies could do, turning him back by sheer moral force.
The Patriarch or Pope of Rome claimed to be the head of the entire
Christian church. Now that there were no more emperors, he began to
annex imperial titles and claims. He took the title of _pontifex
maximus_, head sacrificial priest of the Roman dominion, the most
ancient of all the titles that the emperors had enjoyed.