August 26, 2022

54.THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE | A SHORT HISTORY OF THE WORLD | H. G. WELLS

 A SHORT HISTORY OF THE WORLD 
BY 
H. G. WELLS

54.THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE 

The third quarter of the eighteenth century thus saw the remarkable and unstable spectacle of a Europe divided against itself, and no longer with any unifying political or religious idea, yet through the immense stimulation of men’s imaginations by the printed book, the printed map, and the opportunity of the new ocean-going shipping, able in a disorganized and contentious manner to dominate all the coasts of the world. It was a planless, incoherent ebullition of enterprise due to temporary and almost accidental advantages over the rest of mankind. By virtue of these advantages this new and still largely empty continent of America was peopled mainly from Western European sources, and South Africa and Australia and New Zealand marked down as prospective homes for a European population.

The motive that had sent Columbus to America and Vasco da Gama to India

was the perennial first motive of all sailors since the beginning of

things—trade. But while in the already populous and productive East

the trade motive remained dominant, and the European settlements

remained trading settlements from which the European inhabitants hoped

to return home to spend their money, the Europeans in America, dealing

with communities at a very much lower level of productive activity,

found a new inducement for persistence in the search for gold and

silver. Particularly did the mines of Spanish America yield silver.

The Europeans had to go to America not simply as armed merchants but as

prospectors, miners, searchers after natural products, and presently as

planters. In the north they sought furs. Mines and plantations

necessitated settlements. They obliged people to set up permanent

overseas homes. Finally in some cases, as when the English Puritans

went to New England in the early seventeenth 336}century to escape

religious persecution, when in the eighteenth Oglethorpe sent people

from the English debtors’ prisons to Georgia, and when in the end of

the eighteenth the Dutch sent orphans to the Cape of Good Hope, the

Europeans frankly crossed the seas to find new homes for good. In the

nineteenth century, and especially after the coming of the steamship,

the stream of European emigration to the new empty lands of America and

Australia rose for some decades to the scale of a great migration.


So there grew up permanent overseas populations of Europeans, and the

European culture was transplanted to much larger areas than those in

which it had been developed. These new communities bringing a

ready-made civilization with them to these new lands grew up, as it

were, unplanned and unperceived; the statecraft of Europe did not

foresee them, and was unprepared with any ideas about their treatment.

The politicians and ministers of Europe continued to regard them as

essentially expeditionary establishments, sources of revenue,

“possessions” and “dependencies,” long after their peoples had

developed a keen sense of their separate social life. And also they

continued to treat them as helplessly subject to the mother country

long after the population had spread inland out of reach of any

effectual punitive operations from the sea.


Because until right into the nineteenth century, it must be remembered,

the link of all these overseas empires was the oceangoing sailing ship.

On land the swiftest thing was still the horse, and the cohesion and

unity of political systems on land was still limited by the limitations

of horse communications.


Now at the end of the third quarter of the eighteenth century the

northern two-thirds of North America was under the British crown.

France had abandoned America. Except for Brazil, which was Portuguese,

and one or two small islands and areas in French, British, Danish and

Dutch hands, Florida, Louisiana, California and all America to the

south was Spanish. It was the British colonies south of Maine and Lake

Ontario that first demonstrated the inadequacy of the sailing ship to

hold overseas populations together in one political system.


These British colonies were very miscellaneous in their origin and

character. There were French, Swedish and Dutch settlements as well as

British; there were British Catholics in Maryland and British

ultra-Protestants in New England, and while the New Englanders farmed

their own land and denounced slavery, the British in Virginia and the

south were planters employing a swelling multitude of imported negro

slaves. There was no natural common unity in such states. To get from

one to the other might mean a coasting voyage hardly less tedious than

the transatlantic crossing. But the union that diverse origin and

natural conditions denied the British Americans was forced upon them by

the selfishness and stupidity of the British government in London.

They were taxed without any voice in the spending of the taxes; their

trade was sacrificed to British interests; the highly profitable slave

trade was maintained by the British government in spite of the

opposition of the Virginians who—though quite willing to hold and use

slaves—feared to be swamped by an ever-growing barbaric black

population.

Britain at that time was lapsing towards an intenser form of monarchy,

and the obstinate personality of George III (1760- 1820) did much to

force on a struggle between the home and the colonial governments.

The conflict was precipitated by legislation which favoured the London

East India Company at the expense of the American shipper. Three

cargoes of tea which were imported under the new conditions were thrown

overboard in Boston harbour by a band of men disguised as Indians

(1773). Fighting only began in 1775 when the British government

attempted to arrest two of the American leaders at Lexington near

Boston. The first shots were fired in Lexington by the British; the

first fighting occurred at Concord.

So the American War of Independence began, though for more than a year

the colonists showed themselves extremely unwilling to sever their

links with the mother land. It was not until the middle of 1776 that

the Congress of the insurgent states issued “The Declaration of

Independence.” George Washington, who like many of the leading

colonists of the time had had a military training in the wars against

the French, was made commander-in-chief. In 1777 a British general,

General Burgoyne, in an attempt to reach New York from Canada, was

defeated at Freemans Farm and obliged to surrender at Saratoga. In the

same year the French and Spanish declared war upon Great Britain,

greatly hampering her sea communications. A second British army under

General Cornwallis was caught in the Yorktown peninsula in Virginia and

obliged to capitulate in 1781. In 1783 peace was made in Paris, and

the Thirteen Colonies from Maine to Georgia became a union of

independent sovereign States. So the United States of America came

into existence. Canada remained loyal to the British flag.

For four years these States had only a very feeble central government

under certain Articles of Confederation, and they seemed destined to

break up into separate independent communities. Their immediate

separation was delayed by the hostility of the British and a certain

aggressiveness on the part of the French which brought home to them the

immediate dangers of division. A Constitution was drawn up and

ratified in 1788 establishing a more efficient Federal government with

a President holding very considerable powers, and the weak sense of

national unity was invigorated by a second war with Britain in 1812.

Nevertheless the area covered by the States was so wide and their

interests so diverse at that time, that—given only the means of

communication then available—a disintegration of the Union into

separate states on the European scale of size was merely a question of

time. Attendance at Washington meant a long, tedious and insecure

journey for the senators and congressmen of the remoter districts, and

the mechanical impediments to the diffusion of a common education and a

common literature and intelligence were practically insurmountable.

Forces were at work in the world however that were to arrest the

process of differentiation altogether. Presently came the river

steamboat and then the railway and the telegraph to save the United

States from fragmentation, and weave its dispersed people together

again into the first of great modern nations.

Twenty-two years later the Spanish colonies in America were to follow

the example of the Thirteen and break their connection with Europe.

But being more dispersed over the continent and separated by great

mountainous chains and deserts and forests and by the Portuguese Empire

of Brazil, they did not achieve a union among themselves. They became

a constellation of republican states, very prone at first to wars among

themselves and to revolutions.

Brazil followed a rather different line towards the inevitable

separation. In 1807 the French armies under Napoleon had occupied the

mother country of Portugal, and the monarchy had fled to Brazil. From

that time on until they separated, Portugal was rather a dependency of

Brazil than Brazil of Portugal. In 1822 Brazil declared itself a

separate Empire under Pedro I, a son of the Portuguese King. But the

new world has never been very favourable to monarchy. In 1889 the

Emperor of Brazil was shipped off quietly to Europe, and the United

States of Brazil fell into line with the rest of republican America.